TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION ATTORNEY - LANHAM ACT ENFORCEMENT AND DEFENSE
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT - LANHAM ENFORCEMENT. If someone is copying your registered trademark, copying your trade dress, copying you or diluting your mark with substantially similar replicas, we can help you enforce your rights in Federal Court (including Lanham Act claims) so that only you can use your trademark exclusively, secure injunctions stopping the infringement, seize infringing goods, and of course secure damages for your losses in the market and as well as in goodwill.
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT - LANHAM DEFENSE. On the other hand, if you have been sued in Federal court for infringement and need to defend, we are experts in every type of factual and legal defense including fair use, nominative use, parody, unclean hands, First Amendment, intrinsic fraud in the trademark registration, and challenging the underlying trademark registration itself.
Representative Cases:
King Spider, LLC vs. I.Y.V.E LLC, et. al., USDC Central District of California Case No.: 2:23-CV-3327-KK-AFMx. Represented alleged copying party and provided defense that there was an implied license. Case dismissed - Successfully defended until dismissal of the matter was achieved.
Dreamcatchers vs. Donna Bella, et. al., USDC Utah, 2:23-CV-0008-HCN. Sued multinational conglomerate for trademark infringement for copying trade dress and selling inferior product causing damages in lost sales and to good will. Case settled and client's goals achieved in full.
Spectrum Laboratories vs. US Global Import, Inc., et. al., 2:10-CV-00329-PSG-JC. Successfully defended party accused of trademark and trade dress infringement on multimillion dollar claims. Client's goals achieved through settlement for nominal amount.
Talar Kevorkian Krikor vs. Sports Mall, LLC, et. al., 2:21-CV-02747-DMG. Successfully prosecuted claims for trademark and copyright infringement against literal copier. Client goals achieved through motions for summary judgment and monetary payout to client through settlement.
Performance Plus Marketing, Inc. vs. Amrit Dhillon, et. al., CV12-09295. Sued on behalf of Plaintiff for literal product copying, counterfeiting, and trademark infringement in Federal Court, successfully putting and end to the infringement and ongoing damages caused by the offending parties.
Performance Plus Marketing, Inc. vs. Ken Theung, et. al., CV12-09380. Sued on behalf of Plaintiff for Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Lanham Act, and Trademark Dilution. Case settled per client's goals successfully achieved ending the infringement.
MANY MORE CASES FOUGHT! Inquire further for cases relevant to your specific legal issues.
Countless Trademarks Filed Successfully With the USPTO!