Federal Litigation: Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3), When and How?

By Christopher Brainard, managing attorney for the Legal Team at LawBrainard – Federal Litigation and Strategic Defense Counsel

In federal litigation, venue is not just a procedural technicality—it can define the fairness, cost, and outcome of your case. If your business, organization, or professional practice is named in a lawsuit in the wrong court, you may have strong grounds to challenge that case at the outset by filing a motion to dismiss for improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3).

This article explains when and how to assert a 12(b)(3) motion, what legal standards apply, and why every defendant should consider this early defense strategy in any kind of federal civil case—from breach of contract to intellectual property to antitrust.

⚖️ What Is Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3)?

Rule 12(b)(3) allows a defendant to move to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the wrong federal venue. It specifically addresses whether the court is the appropriate geographic location to hear the case based on the governing venue statutes—not whether the court has subject matter or personal jurisdiction.

If a case is brought in an improper district, the court must either:

  • Dismiss the case, or

  • Transfer it to a proper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) “in the interest of justice”

🧭 When Is Venue Proper in Federal Court?

Venue is governed primarily by 28 U.S.C. § 1391, which sets the default rules for where a federal civil case may be filed.

Under § 1391(b), venue is generally proper in:

  1. A district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state;

  2. A district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred; or

  3. If no such district exists, any district where the defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction.

Additionally, subject-specific statutes like 15 U.S.C. § 22 (antitrust), 28 U.S.C. § 1400 (patents), or the federal removal statute may provide alternative or more limited venue options.

✅ When Should You File a 12(b)(3) Motion?

You should consider filing a Rule 12(b)(3) motion when:

1. Your business has no meaningful connection to the forum

  • No office, staff, or property in the district

  • No business operations or contracts performed there

  • No marketing or outreach targeted to residents of the forum

  • No online conduct specifically directed at that district

2. The events at issue occurred elsewhere

If the key conduct, breach, or injury took place in a different district—especially where your operations are based—venue may be improper.

3. The plaintiff is “forum shopping”

If a plaintiff selects a venue solely for strategic reasons, like favorable juries or plaintiff-friendly precedent, Rule 12(b)(3) allows you to push back and restore fairness to the litigation.

🔄 What Happens If the Court Agrees Venue Is Improper?

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, the court has two options:

  • Dismiss the action

  • Transfer it to a federal district where the case could have been brought originally

Dismissal is appropriate when:

  • The plaintiff made no good-faith attempt to select the correct venue

  • Transfer would cause prejudice

  • The case is fatally flawed beyond the venue defect

Transfer is more common when venue is wrong but jurisdiction and procedural fairness can be preserved in a different district.

🔍 Key Differences: Venue vs. Jurisdiction

It’s important to distinguish between venue and jurisdiction:

Concept Definition Motion
Subject Matter Jurisdiction Court’s authority over the type of case (e.g., federal question or diversity) Rule 12(b)(1)
Personal Jurisdiction Court’s authority over the defendant themselves Rule 12(b)(2)
Venue Court’s status as the proper geographic location for the case Rule 12(b)(3)

Venue objections must be raised early or risk being waived.

🧾 What to Include in a Strong Rule 12(b)(3) Motion

To maximize the effectiveness of a 12(b)(3) motion, your filing should include:

  • A clear legal basis for why venue is improper

  • Factual support showing lack of residence, operations, or relevant conduct in the forum

  • Declarations from company officers or principals

  • Supporting documentation (e.g., state registration records, business licenses, contracts)

Courts look favorably on factual specificity, not bare assertions.

🤝 How We Help Clients Assert Venue Defenses in Federal Court

At LawBrainard, we help clients defend against improperly filed federal cases in all types of matters, including:

  • Business and contract litigation

  • Class actions

  • Intellectual property disputes

  • Antitrust and trade regulation

  • Employment and corporate law

We evaluate each case for early procedural defenses and work quickly to:

  • Prepare and file Rule 12(b)(3) motions

  • Build evidentiary support for venue challenges

  • Leverage improper venue claims to negotiate dismissal or transfer

  • Combine venue defenses with 12(b)(2) or 12(b)(6) for maximum effect

📞 Call us at (310) 266-4115
🌐 Visit: www.LawBrainard.com
🗓 Schedule a consultation with our federal litigation team today.

This article/blog is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Christopher Brainard, Esq. An attorney-client relationship can only be formed through a written and signed agreement with Christopher Brainard. If you need legal advice about your specific situation contact us for a consultation. [Christopher Brainard, 651 N. Sepulveda Blvd., #2010, Bel Air, CA 90049. Tel: (310) 266 - 4115. Email: christopherbrainard@gmail.com].

Back to blog